Search

Loading...
Powered by Blogger.

Added 28 Nov 2011

ZIP Code

Enjoy this blog?

World Law

This post was originally published at: http://canadian-state-of-the-union.blogspot.com/2009/10/law-of-future-world-law-being.html

"LAW OF THE FUTURE" - World Law - Being Implemented NOW
To a large extent, governance has become a concept that transcends borders. Despite all the far-reaching consequences (implicit or explicit, potential or real), of globalisation and the internationalisation of the domestic arena, however, it is important to realise that the national legal order is ultimately still of paramount importance. In the absence of a world government - and concomitantly a world legislature, executive and judiciary -- domestic courts must dispense justice at the only level that is currently feasible: the national level.
Did you know that pending the arrival of "WORLD LAW," they are harmonizing our NATIONAL LAW by group-training the judiciaries of our national HIGHEST COURTS at the supranational level?

What has this got to do with the Gomberg Map of World Unions (i.e., Hebrewland amongst continental unions)?  Keep reading.

Have you heard of the I O J T ?
"Dr. Shlomo Levin, then Deputy President of the Supreme Court of Israel, who conceived the organization, proposed that it have the following objectives: - Sharing successful methods of addressing issues of common interest regarding judicial training, and - Establishing an international mechanism to enable training institutes from one country to learn from another."
{Why, Dr. Levin, we must train our own judges, thank you!}
"On March 17 - 21, 2002, following several planning meetings in South America and Israel, the International Organization for Judicial Training (IOJT) was established in Jerusalem. Over 100 educators and judges from 25 countries and the Council of Europe assembled to create the organization. Countries creating the IOJT included Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China. Colombia, Czech Republic, Ecuador, Estonia, France, Georgia, Ireland, Israel, Kenya, Latvia, Lithuania, Madagascar, Mexico, Moldova, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Sweden, Togo, and the United States of America."
Source for both the above quotations:
Same file backed up at Calameo:

United Kingdom is not mentioned, but may have been implied in the word "included", as LORD BINGHAM, Senior Law Lord, United Kingdom, was a "confirmed speaker" at the HIIL in 2008 on the general topic of:

"What is the role of highest courts in maintaining legal unity in the internationalising world of today?"

The Good Lord (freudian slip) was accompanied by Canadians including a "former judge of the Supreme Court of CANADA: Michel Bastarache.

Same file backed up at Calameo:

Why, I wouldn't have thought they'd have ANY "role" at all. However, the "role" they are apparently "given" which fell from the sky, because it doesn't come from our jurisdiction under a written Constitution in Canada, and under the STATUTE purporting to establish our Supreme Court of Canada -- is tantamount to HARMONIZING DOMESTIC NATIONAL LAW world-wide to advance WORLD GOVERNMENT.  And, whaddaya know, the idea comes from Israel... I mean Hebrewland.

That was "Workshop #1".

Worksop #2 begins from this premise, that "the changing role of highest national courts will be placed in the context of the new challenges that have resulted as a consequence of the changing global environment." Sound democratic to you?

The "highest courts" of the formerly sovereign nations around the world are now engaged in supranational TRAINING sessions tantamount to HARMONIZATION OF DOMESTIC LAW across the globe. Is that "constitutional" to you Brits?

Have you heard of the "Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law" (HIIL)?
"What is HiiL?

"HiiL was born out of the recognition that globalisation and internationalisation are affecting societies profoundly and have far-reaching consequences for how national legal systems function. In today’s world, national legal systems can no longer be described as ‘autonomous’. The world increasingly faces problems which transcend national borders and cannot be resolved by national laws alone. They require international solutions. At the same time, the national level remains the most basic level at which the law operates. How can the movement towards the international and the fact that the law must work at the local level be reconciled?

HiiL encourages, initiates, facilitates, and funds research on these issues and takes an active part in the international debate.

HiiL is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. Particular events organised by HiiL have been sponsored by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Dutch Ministry of Justice, and the Maison Descartes in the Netherlands."
Same file backed up at Calameo:

TRANSLATION: "no longer be described as ‘autonomous’" = NO LONGER DERIVE THEIR JURISDICTIONS FROM THEIR CONSTITUTIONS! How extraordinary!
"The world increasingly faces problems which transcend national borders and cannot be resolved by national laws alone. They require international solutions" = the same nonsense they are flogging re Energy, Resources, Technology, and Climate Change has somehow magically descended upon our NATIONAL DOMESTIC "HIGHEST COURTS" to force our Judges to adopt HARMONIZED LAW across the planet. Did we vote for that?  Would our Constitutions even allow it to be subject to a vote?  i.e., as in coup d'état by referendum?
"movement towards the international" = euphemism for World Government

In fact, the HIIL "inventory" document [http://www.hiil.org/assets/233/ac2008_inventory.pdf] (@ Calameo) says, at page 14 of 121:
"To a large extent, governance has become a concept that transcends borders. Despite all the far-reaching consequences (implicit or explicit, potential or real), of globalisation and the internationalisation of the domestic arena, however, it is important to realise that the national legal order is ultimately still of paramount importance. In the absence of a world government - and concomitantly a world legislature, executive and judiciary -- domestic courts must dispense justice at the only level that is currently feasible: the national level. Indeed, the continuing relevance of national legal orders within an internationalised environment is the reason that HiiL exists. Nation-states continue to bear ultimate responsibility for 'delivering the goods' to citizens. The national legal orders in which they operate retain pride of place. Both complicating factors - the decreasing autonomy of nation-states and the continuing relevance of the national legal order - lie at the heart of the HiiL research programme.[FN 4: HiiL Research Programme National Law in a Global Society (Section 3)] Despite the continued relevance of national legal orders, however, the consequences of globalisation are [italics sic] far-reaching, and this fact complicates the CORE JUDICIAL TASK of reaching decisions on concrete contentious issues before the courts."
"Complicates"?

How "complicated" is it to look to your national Constitution to fulfill your "CORE JUDICIAL TASK"? There is, after all, NO OTHER SOURCE OF JURISDICTION for national domestic litigation.

"world legislature, executive and judiciary" -- why, you can just see why some of these people are ambitious. Lord Bingham, for example. How old is he? Will he live long enough for a post on the "world judiciary"? I bet some of our hoary old Canadian judges are lining up for kidney transplants to improve their chances! Who wants to be a dowdy old Canadian judge when you can have real prestige and be a World Judge!

Lord Bingham, here's the old boy: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bingham,_Baron_Bingham_of_Cornhill

Born 1933. He might still have a couple of good years in him. 

 
In other words, the HIGHEST COURTS of our (formerly) sovereign nations are to be USED FOR NOW, pending WORLD JUDICIARY, and WORLD GOVERNMENT, to dispense WORLD LAW at the domestic level, and thanks to the unheard-of function of dispensing international law at the domestic level, our own courts are therefore still (if grudgingly) "relevant".

And we have a PAMPHLET: "LAW OF THE FUTURE"

Lord Bingham participating !

And a former Supreme Court of Canada Judge participating.

Apparently, our High Court no longer takes its "role" from our Constitution.

The I O J T was established in Jerusalem. "Jerusalem"! do you get the impression we are all being ZIONIZED?

There is the distinct ring about this of a statement by David Ben Gurion, quoted in Look Magazine in 1962:

"In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind." (Duke 2002).
Have you heard of the HIIL - Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law?

Source: http://www.hiil.org/about-hiil/
Same file backed up at Calameo:
* http://en.calameo.com/books/000111790189a7668e7ba

"What is HiiL?

"HiiL was born out of the recognition that globalisation and internationalisation are affecting societies profoundly and have far-reaching consequences for how national legal systems function. In today’s world, national legal systems can no longer be described as ‘autonomous’. The world increasingly faces problems which transcend national borders and cannot be resolved by national laws alone. They require international solutions. At the same time, the national level remains the most basic level at which the law operates. How can the movement towards the international and the fact that the law must work at the local level be reconciled?

HiiL encourages, initiates, facilitates, and funds research on these issues and takes an active part in the international debate.

HiiL is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. Particular events organised by HiiL have been sponsored by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Dutch Ministry of Justice, and the Maison Descartes in the Netherlands."
According to Niki F. Raapana and Nordica M. Friedrich, authors of THE ANTI COMMUNITARIAN MANIFESTO (December 19, 2003), we are all having Communist Zionist "law" shoved down our throats through the United Nations:
Say Raapana & Friedrich: "As for the future, not only are American law schools teaching communitarian law (Harvard 2000) and Talmudic Law (Zacariah 2002) to American lawyers and judges, Chinese communitarian courts and the United Nations export local regulations as blueprints for overruling national laws (Miethe 2003; Veon 1998-2003). Global to local Zionist-communitarian law prevails (Wald 1998), and unnatural evolution guides us into holistic subservience to a superior, master empire.
Source: The Historical Evolution of Communitarian Thinking, PART TWO
http://nord.twu.net/acl/evolution.html

And here is CANADA "collaborating":  the "Law Commission of Canada" was created in 2007 (if the statute is valid! Ha!) and has a four-fold "mandate" which includes:
1. to "focus on": "New Concepts of Law: The Commission was to work towards the development of new concepts of law and new approaches to law."

2. Efficiency and Accessibility: The Commission was to consider measures to make the legal system more efficient, economical and accessible.

3. Stimulating Critical Debate: The Commission was charged with stimulating critical debate about the law and how it operates in Canadian society. It was encouraged to forge productive networks with academic and other communities to ensure cooperation and coordination in law reform initiatives.
[Note: these would have to be those "international law reform initiatives" already established for us out of JERUSALEM, Ben Gurion's "seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind"]
4. Eliminating Obsolescence and Anomalies: The Commission was to work towards the elimination of obsolescence and anomalies in the current law.
"Obsolescence and Anomalies" = god forbid (I mean the real Good Lord) that our Judiciary, in the normal course of adjudication, should be allowed to pursue this traditional role of adjusting domestic law to suit the current state of domestic society. We now have a specialized commission RELIEVING them of this unwieldy element of their CORE JURISDICTION. Thus suggesting that those we have been so unfortunate as to elect have already abolished our Courts.

In fact, I know they have.

Source: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/dpr-rmr/2006-2007/inst/cld/cld01-eng.asp
Same file backed up in Calameo:
http://en.calameo.com/books/000111790bd753eb8f0e1

I am betting our so-called "Law Commission" is working to ELIMINATE anything Canadian, that is, "democratic," and thus aid the "harmonization" of formerly Canadian law with international COMMUNIST, TALMUDIC, ZIONIST LAW.

The Law Commission of Canada Act can be found on the Justice Canada's web site at: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showtdm/cs/L-6.7 [It's 2h20 a.m., I haven't had a chance to look at that.]

In the course of its annual Report of its activities, bottom of that same page, the Law Commission states its Priority #3:
"Collaborate with the Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law on work related to Globalization and Law"
In other words, they are "collaborating" with ISRAEL in the elimination of Canadian law, to replace it with WORLD LAW.

Let's see what the Supreme Court of Canada thinks its "role" is:

"Role of the Court
The Court's Jurisdiction

The Supreme Court of Canada is Canada's final court of appeal, the last judicial resort for all litigants, whether individuals or governments. Its jurisdiction embraces both the civil law of the province of Quebec and the common law of the other provinces and territories. 
The Supreme Court of Canada stands at the apex of the Canadian judicial system. The Canadian courts may be seen as a pyramid, with a broad base formed by the provincial and territorial courts whose judges are appointed by the provincial and territorial governments. At the next level, there are the provinces' and territories' superior courts whose judges are appointed by the federal government."


Apparently no, it stands at the icicle-pick end of dripping globalism accelerated by phoney "climate change".

Nothing on that page suggests a supranational role for the Supreme Court of Canada in creating World Government.

In any event, Michel Bastarache was not a Judge when he spoke to the HiiL Conference.

He had already retired from the Supreme Court of Canada Bench on 24 June 2008; a "role" he took up on 30 September 1997, the one-year anniversary of the Chrétien government's Order-in-Council of 30 September 1996 directing the "Secession" Reference to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Hey, what a coincidence! That was the same date noted legal scholar, the Honourable Mr. Justice Gérard Vincent La Forest, resigned (possibly in disgust). Judge Bastarache replaced the Honourable Mr. Justice John Sopinka, who died suddenly of a rare "blood disease" shortly before "hearings" were to begin on the "Reference re the Phoney Secession of Quebec" -- a scam to impose the European Union system on Canada to kick-start the North American Union on the way to one-world Zionist Government.


They are and have for decades been using "Quebec independence" as blackmail to impose the EU system, which is the basis of world federalism AS SEEN ON THE GOMBERG MAP OF WORLD UNIONS on all of Canada, but disguised as "Sovereignty Association".

For more on that, read my other Blog, Habeas Corpus Canada Comments:


CONCLUSIONS:

Given the Balfour Declaration of 1917, who do you think is behind this travesty? Anyone with the last name "Rothschild"? And then, of course, there's the 1941-42 GOMBERG MAP, with "HEBREWLAND" in the midst of a great COMMUNIST world federation that arguably resembles precisely what they are doing to us right now:



Note: for the BEST zoom quality, please download the PDF file in the Overview.

My best regards to one and all! Sleep tight, children, in Referendumland.

Kathleen Moore
HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union
... and Zionist World Government